Don't miss Dylan's Lectionary Blog, this week, where Sarah Dylan Breuer reminds us that the Twelve is a reconsitution of the twelve tribes of Israel, and that the Seventy can be seen as a parallel to the seventy elders appointed by Moses (Numbers 11) to be anointed with the spirit and assist in Moses' mission. Sarah writes:
"The wideness of God's mercy can be intimidating or even frightening to those who are accustomed to Mitzrayim, the narrow place. We may look back with longing to narrowness, and to comforting rules about who can and should prophesy."Interesting words here for all, and maybe especially for us in the U.S., preaching on Independence Day, perhaps thinking about issues of prophecy, justice, freedom, mercy, etc, as individuals and as a nation.
From Paul Nuechterlein's Girardian Reflections on the Lectionary:
"Once again, I take issue with the omitting of verses. The woes on the Jewish towns, in the omitted verses 10:12-15, might be the whole point of this passage, with the sending out and return of the 70 forming an inclusion around it. Last week's story showed the disciples desiring a divine firestorm upon a Samaritan town and Jesus rebuking them. This week the omitted verses have Jesus telling his disciples that the time of judgment will actually be worse for Jewish towns than for Samaritan towns. I think this fits in well with the theme of my paper concerning the insider/outsider dynamic (see comments on last week's Gospel). Those who play the insider/outsider games will find themselves judged by them. In other words, they eventually bring judgment on themselves. There is even the sense of a special responsibility borne by God's chosen people "because you did not recognize the time of your visitation from God" (below, Luke 19:44)."Whether we consider ourselves to think/act within liberal or conservative models, theologically and/or socially/politically, it seems helpful to consider the responsibility that goes along with understandings that we are somehow "blessed" or "chosen" (or even recipients of grace!). What exactly is our responsibility, when we consider ourselves to be "called" to mission? To evangelism? To social action? What is our responsibility - REALLY, not just rhetorically - as receipients of grace? These are more difficult issues, I think, in reality than they are in rhetoric. From the pulpit, whether we are liberal or conservative, they preach fairly well and fairly easily. But really meditating on them from within an understanding of radical grace and radical freedom, within the realities of our current communities - from families to churches to nations - can be more difficult. These issues, maybe, are fairly easy in the abstract - and in our rhetoric for ourselves and against others - but in our own day to day life, it's a whole lot more complex. How do we give others an opportunity to think through these issues with complexity instead of preaching platitudes? It seems to me that this is part of the purpose of these passages (and perhaps the gospel of Luke) in the first place.
Lindy Black has listed some interesting quotations about pride, at Sermon Nuggets. Pride and humiility seem to be part of the issue in these chapters of Luke. (We go from this section on mission to the story of the Good Samaritan in next week's gospel, and in the next story in the narrative of Luke.) These, also, are complex issues. In the abstract, it's easy to say, "Pride bad. Humility good," and then to go on to list the ways that we have humility and "they" have pride - the harmful kind. If we have pride, it's the good kind. Or, we DID have the bad kind, but Christ has given us the good kind. Again, I wonder what it means to engage in a more complex analysis of some of this - whether we are liberal or conservative - so that it makes a concrete difference in our own lives and in the lives of others. I wonder what actually doing this, instead of just saying it, would mean for us as individuals and communities, in terms of, perhaps an Exodus of our own - toward, as Paul might say, enslavement only to God. What would that even mean , in real life, for us to be completely dependent only on God, and completely free within that dependence alone? Or have we - whether we consider ourselves conservative or liberal - already made that journey, and is the Exodus - as a nation or as individuals - in our own past, as it has been considered in the past by so many folks throughout history? How do we live within a reality that the Exodus lived by Moses and by Jesus is also the Exodus to which WE are called - as we leave the "narrow places" of the Egypts and the power of sin and oppression in which WE live, and head off into radical freedom, salvation, and total dependence on God?